This is my first Substack. Having resigned from the legal profession and closed my legal firm, (effective as from 30th August 2024), I find myself with time on my hands to look into all matters peaceful non-compliance, as a way to try and push back against an increasingly authoritarian and Orwellian landscape unfolding around the world, implemented by governments at the behest of the highest globalist bidder.
You might, (rightly), ask why I would leave the legal profession and not spend my days gardening, meditating and going for haircuts. I could of course do these things, and I very much hope to spend at least some of my time dedicated to them. But I have more than a niggling concern that if more of us do not investigate peaceful non-compliance against increasingly totalitarian policies, there may be no gardening, meditation or haircuts for anyone. And perhaps a good many more everyday things may also disappear - certainly, free speech seems to be going that way.
The central theme of this Substack at present is taxation. However, there are only so many posts one can make about the same, so it will naturally evolve, and I intend to examine the armoury of non-compliance measures and delve into other areas. It also occurs to me that I should at least try to put some of my quarter century legal knowledge to good use by examining our modern legal and courts system, and asking questions about whether they actually serve us, or seek to enslave us. These sorts of things will come further down the line after I have toe-dipped into Substack for a while and gauged how I have been received, as I am more than aware that perhaps no one will be interested in my musings.
But today I start the exercise of investigating peaceful non-compliance by looking at the rather dry subject of taxation. Whilst I will be mainly focusing on this from a UK perspective, I may take the odd gander around the world. As I have already alluded, my primary reason for this delve into duties and tariffs is purely and unashamedly from a resistance perspective. You see, tax resistance has a rich and varied history, spanning different cultures and epochs. It continues to be used as a means of protest, conscientious objection, and nonviolent resistance worldwide, and has shaped history, sparked revolutions, and prompted significant social and political change.
I have listed some notable examples of tax resistance below to get us started, (there are a great many more than I have listed), but in advance of you reading them, I should warn you that you may need several gin and tonics to help see you through the first few of these Substack posts, because it is going to be necessary, (and a little painful), to look into the history of taxation in the UK and around the world, how tax revenue is allocated in our country, and in later posts to delve into the legislation in the UK governing taxation – we have to know our enemy you see.
Notable examples of tax resistance:
In 578 AD, residents of Limoges rioted against tax collectors, leading to harsh government responses.
The Peace and Truce of God movement saw Christian clergy resisting taxes on church property imposed by warlords.
In 1041, residents of Worcester rebelled against the Danegeld collected by King Harthacnut, resulting in violence.
In 1197, residents of Constantinople refused to pay a tax imposed by Alexios III Angelos, forcing him to collect the sum by stripping ornaments from old tombs.
A war tax instituted by the Florentine seigniory led to mass tax resistance, ultimately forcing the government to abandon the tax
Tax resistance played a crucial role in the American Revolution, with colonists protesting against British taxation without representation
The poll tax riots in the UK were a significant moment of civil unrest during the late 1980s and early 1990s. The demonstrations were successful in drawing attention to the unpopularity of the poll tax. Margaret Thatcher resigned in November 1990, and her departure was influenced (though not solely caused) by the London poll tax revolt
A *very* brief history of taxation – more to come in later Substacks
Taxation has a long history that spans civilizations and millennia. It has shaped societies, economies, and political landscapes throughout history, from ancient Egypt to the present day. Below is a very brief overview of taxation around the world, and its historical roots.
Ancient Roots:
Around 5,000 years ago, in ancient Egypt, even before the use of coined currency, the Pharaoh collected a 20 percent tax on all grain harvests.
Julius Caesar implemented the first sales tax during the Roman Empire
Early Administrative Considerations:
Import duties on imported products were among the earliest taxes due to their ease of collection.
Turnover taxes (levied on gross sales) were common before the invention of complex Value-Added Tax (VAT).
Head (poll) taxes and land taxes were the first direct levies.
Roman Taxation:
In ancient Rome, taxes included consumption taxes, customs duties, and certain “direct” taxes.
The tributum, a head tax, was later extended to real estate holdings.
Rome had an early inheritance tax (5–10 percent) with exemptions for close relatives of the deceased.
Middle Ages and Obligatory Services:
In the Middle Ages, ancient taxes gave way to obligatory services and a system of “aids.”
Transit duties (taxes on goods passing through a country) and market fees were common
Modern Taxation:
From the late 18th century to today, modern taxation evolved globally – so a growth over the last 250 years, coincidentally during the same time period as America’s independence.
Taxation impacts nations, economies, and daily life, shaping history and sparking revolutions
Looking closer to home – income tax
The first permanent British income tax was introduced in 1799 by William Pitt the Younger. It served to fund weapons and equipment during the Napoleonic Wars. The introduction of the tax faced significant opposition and initially it was highly unpopular and widely evaded, especially among merchants and manufacturers. However, as time passed, the tax came to be accepted as “a vital price for winning the war against Napoleon”, and many started to see payment of it as their “patriotic duty”. As the war continued, the need for revenue became more urgent. The government emphasized the importance of funding the military and maintaining national security by public awareness campaigns, impressing upon citizens the necessity for income tax for defence and stability. One can almost smell the fear propaganda from here.
The Income Tax Act of 1799 provided the legal basis for implementation of income tax, outlining rates and procedures, and historical records reveal the gradual acceptance of income tax as “a vital tool for national survival during a time of conflict”. Those last 11 words rather beg the question as to why we are still paying the wretched thing. Are we to believe we are in perpetual state of conflict and paying it for national survival? I ask as I feel quite sure that everyone reading this maiden Substack post of mine will be well aware that the intention was for income tax in Britain to be a temporary measure. However, the increasing cost of “government commitments”, made income tax a fixture and it has remained ever since the Act of 1799, thereby no longer considered a temporary arrangement. So, what were those government commitments that caused the temporary tax to become a permanent feature? Well, largely they were a lot of wars. Here are a few to consider:
Second Anglo-Maratha War (1802–1805):
Britain clashed with the Maratha Empire in India.
Napoleonic Wars (1802–1813):
A series of conflicts involving Britain, France, and their allies.
War of 1812 (1812–1815):
Fought between Britain and the United States and key events included the burning of Washington, D.C., and the Battle of New Orleans
Hundred Days War (1815):
The return of Napoleon Bonaparte from exile led to his final defeat at the Battle of Waterloo.
Anglo-Nepalese War (1813–1816):
· Britain clashed with the Kingdom of Nepal in the Indian subcontinent.
6. The Crimean War (October 1853 to February 1856)
Fought between the Russian Empire and an alliance of the Ottoman Empire, France, the United Kingdom, and Sardinia-Piedmont. The conflict was triggered by a dispute over the rights of Christian minorities in Palestine
When we consider the above, it is not hard to raise the argument that taxation and war have a deep and intrinsic connection. Governments need resources to wage wars, including financing armies, weapons, logistics, and infrastructure. Tax revenue provides a significant portion of this funding and during times of conflict, governments often increase taxes or introduce new ones to cover war-related expenses. With this in mind, it feels pertinent to ask the perfectly reasonable question “is war waged to (in part) create further taxation”? If the answer is yes, we then need to ask who profits from this arrangement. We do not have to look far to know that it is those involved in supplying the war machine, but more on that another time. For now, below is a summary of some key points and statistics on the United Kingdom’s military/defence spending over past years:
Recent Trends:
In 2022, the U.K. allocated £50.3 billion for its defence budget, representing 2.23% of its GDP.
In 2021, the defence budget was £49.5 billion, marking a 15.72% increase from the previous year.
In 2020, it stood at £42.8 billion, reflecting a 3.12% increase from 2019.
2. Historical Context:
During World War II, the U.K.'s defence budget reached a peak of approximately £86 billion (in real terms) in 1944.
In the 1990s, the U.K. spent about 4.1% of its GDP on defence, witnessing a rise after a period of relative stability.
3. Current Figures:
In the most recently completed financial year (2023/24), the U.K.'s defence budget was £54.2 billion
Projections indicate an increase to £57.1 billion in 2024/25.
NB: The above figures include both current and capital expenditures related to armed forces, peacekeeping, and defence projects
To put the above into context, let’s delve into official government figures for at home funding for law enforcement and public safety. You likely already know that the Home Office is responsible for law enforcement, immigration, and national security. In the financial year 2022-23, the Home Office’s budget was approximately £17.9 billion, around 65% less than defence spending in 2022 - a period when we were not even at war (officially).
The Home Office budget supports police forces, counter-terrorism efforts, border control, and crime prevention, and its funding is distributed across various departments such as the Ministry of Justice, who manage the legal system, prisons, and probation services. With such scant resources when compared to non-war footing defence spending, it should come as no surprise to anyone that our prisons are now out of room, our criminal justice system is in chaos, and our police force do little to prevent crime.
Whilst the allocation of tax revenue may sometimes be a complex matter, it is quite plain to see that us tax paying citizens really do need to hold our government accountable and ensure that tax revenue is used efficiently and effectively, and mainly at home! In days gone by I would have said that us plebeians could influence tax allocation decisions through advocacy, petitions, letters, and public campaigns, to raise awareness and pressure policymakers. Today I feel very disenfranchised with such processes, simply because our government does not listen to us about anything. It is clear why, (to all but the blind), - they are under external influence from unelected supra national bodies.
And so it is that I find myself stumbling into tax resistance to try and take a stand and make a positive change. I hope more people will join me in stumbling around with this. Who knows, we may achieve something. Certainly, once we have further explored UK tax revenues, more about where tax revenue is allocated, (hint the BOE is involved), and just how much unnecessary tax people pay, we may even start a tax revolution. Peaceful of course.
But for now, that’s it folks. More to come later. Thanks for sticking with me and reading this until end if you made it. I will be back soon with more tax facts and figures, and no doubt some tax conspiracies for us all to consider. Until then take care everyone and god bless.
Thanks for this. I’m keen to learn more and especially our best strategies to peacefully decline the offer to pay (illegal?) taxes! I’m 100% aware of the vice grip getting stronger and so your efforts to educate people on lawful remedies is much appreciated! 🙏
“no one will be interested in my musings” are you kidding? A lawyer discussing non-compliance in the midst of a full blown totalitarian take over should be one of the top substacks to read. The US is well served with substack authors and Covid and jab driven excess deaths is exhaustively covered. My current strategy is non engagement non compliance based on a belief that it is our duty to fight back and one way is non payment of bills, debts, taxes to a fraudulent system. Thank you for this article, always learning and listening to different options. I’m glad I came across your substack. Good luck.