Oh yes I know about this. I opted out of organ donation years ago - who knows if that bloody matters though given the proliferation of unlawful DNR's over the last 5 years they probaby will just add me back on the list! Its horrific
It's always refreshing for me to see crucial content like this provided for free. Superb stuff again Clare! This same pro-euthanasia lockstep agenda going global. ''Population management.''
Looking at Canada to see how things may develop, during the plandemic I recall the Canadian Psychiatric Society stating that anyone who rejected the life saving miracle cure being offered by the State could be considered mentally ill. Just days later their upstanding leader, black-face Trudeau, introduced a Bill to expand the use of MAID (medical assistance in dying) to include the mentally ill. It was rejected at the time but is expected to pass in 2027. Anyway, join those dots...
Yep I have real fears about the old mental illness card being dragged out as a push to opt people into this. I am so concerned about the nudging - we saw how it was put to use in Convid and how people turned into animals against anyone not complying. Can you imagine if they roll out a similar nudge with euthanasia. Doesnt bear thinking about
"I am NOT suggesting that MPs are rubbing their hands together about the ‘savings’ that euthanasia may bring."
Well Clare you are more generous than I!
I suggest that that is exactly what they're doing. I remember seeing a calculation of just how much in pension payouts had been saved by the care-home deaths. They are so shit hot at their modelling, I do not doubt for one moment that the calculations have already been made.
My mother was euthanised two years ago this week. She was suffering from vascular dementia (accelerated by pfizer), gangrene and an infection around her pacemaker. They said they couldn't operate and she needed to go onto 'end of life' "care"
When I arrived at day 4 (long story) and asked why she wasn't in hospice care as had been previously discussed with my 90 year old Dad, the row of four white coats with clipboards said "we don't think she would survive the journey". I nearly lost it. I said "seriously? you've put her on drugs to kill her and you're worried about her not surviving a move that would make things a little easier for my Dad?" When I added " Of course, silly me, she counts towards your quota of end of life patients doesn't she?" they all scurried out and left us in peace.
In a lucid moment Mum said she'd 'had enough’ she wanted to go, so in a way she was a willing participant, but it was awful to watch. It took her 11 days to die.
The system is beyond saving. May they all rot in hell.
Thank you Clare for this illuminating piece, and thank you for your presentation last weekend in Bristol, you were brilliant.
HOW DO so many IDIOTS get into prominent positions in american media etc etc etc…are all of them just psychotic powermongering egotistical grabbers? ONE thing is sure, they certainly lack understanding…they work to make life worse…
'Nudge Units' (etc) - I wonder what we actually vote for during elections, if not for the implicit acceptance of such psychological influencing? If political parties were prevented from promulgating their world / political views once elected, one could argue that we could do away with representative democracy in the way it is currently conceptualised (at least at a National level) - that is, voting for a person / group that hold similar 'political' viewpoints, beliefs etc - and replacing it all with 5-year job slots for competent individuals to apply for and occupy before having to 're-apply' through a ballot box (come to think of it, it seems that is what is happening now anyway...). I am not advocating for the use of the psychological influence units, merely thinking through what it means to participate in a system where we assume that the 'winners' will not indulge in efforts to make people more likely to do as they are told and like it, and will not seek to influence future voting decisions in their favour (using the very state machinery we pay for!).
'Euthanasia' and 'Bodily Autonomy' - It is abhorrent that the state can prevent its 'citizens' from voluntarily, with no risk to others, and at their own expense, seeking potentially life saving treatments and life ending procedures. I have been horrified at instances over the last few years where the UK state has sought to prevent parents from accessing potentially life saving treatments for their children (inside and outside of the UK). And whilst this is the polar opposite of the central theme of the article, it does point to the UK State attitude to individual freedom and bodily autonomy - you have none. And if that is true, how CAN we trust that this legislation will not, over time, become a convenient way of dealing with inconvenient problems?
Thanks for another excellent article Clare.
The elephant in the room here is that the government can kill you to harvest your organs.
Most people are now organ doners whether they realize it or not.
Organ harvesting is big business.
Brain-Dead is yet another lie of the Medical Industrial Establishment, completely made up in 1967 to harvest people's body parts.
It is absolutely gross to learn that harvesting takes place when the person is alive.
The very brave Dr Byrne blew the whistle on this years ago, but all been swept under the carpet.
Here is an extract from an interview. Lots of links to more research via the comments section of the video.
We are cattle to them and they will utilize every last part of us for their ill gotten means.
https://youtu.be/5IRQtONl2fs
When you add to the covid death protocols from vaxxed 3 documentary, it does not take much to join the dots.
Here is a published paper on the brain death lie
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/20508549.1999.11877528
Here is the BMJ paper on ethical & policy implications on organ donors
https://jme.bmj.com/content/31/7/406
Oh yes I know about this. I opted out of organ donation years ago - who knows if that bloody matters though given the proliferation of unlawful DNR's over the last 5 years they probaby will just add me back on the list! Its horrific
It's always refreshing for me to see crucial content like this provided for free. Superb stuff again Clare! This same pro-euthanasia lockstep agenda going global. ''Population management.''
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/exclusivenew-scotsgov-palliative
You are too kind Dave - I am taking a look at your article now
Looking at Canada to see how things may develop, during the plandemic I recall the Canadian Psychiatric Society stating that anyone who rejected the life saving miracle cure being offered by the State could be considered mentally ill. Just days later their upstanding leader, black-face Trudeau, introduced a Bill to expand the use of MAID (medical assistance in dying) to include the mentally ill. It was rejected at the time but is expected to pass in 2027. Anyway, join those dots...
Yep I have real fears about the old mental illness card being dragged out as a push to opt people into this. I am so concerned about the nudging - we saw how it was put to use in Convid and how people turned into animals against anyone not complying. Can you imagine if they roll out a similar nudge with euthanasia. Doesnt bear thinking about
"I am NOT suggesting that MPs are rubbing their hands together about the ‘savings’ that euthanasia may bring."
Well Clare you are more generous than I!
I suggest that that is exactly what they're doing. I remember seeing a calculation of just how much in pension payouts had been saved by the care-home deaths. They are so shit hot at their modelling, I do not doubt for one moment that the calculations have already been made.
My mother was euthanised two years ago this week. She was suffering from vascular dementia (accelerated by pfizer), gangrene and an infection around her pacemaker. They said they couldn't operate and she needed to go onto 'end of life' "care"
When I arrived at day 4 (long story) and asked why she wasn't in hospice care as had been previously discussed with my 90 year old Dad, the row of four white coats with clipboards said "we don't think she would survive the journey". I nearly lost it. I said "seriously? you've put her on drugs to kill her and you're worried about her not surviving a move that would make things a little easier for my Dad?" When I added " Of course, silly me, she counts towards your quota of end of life patients doesn't she?" they all scurried out and left us in peace.
In a lucid moment Mum said she'd 'had enough’ she wanted to go, so in a way she was a willing participant, but it was awful to watch. It took her 11 days to die.
The system is beyond saving. May they all rot in hell.
Thank you Clare for this illuminating piece, and thank you for your presentation last weekend in Bristol, you were brilliant.
May God bless you for your work.
The only comment I want to make regarding the travesties confronting us is...The world is being run by insane gangsters.
HOW DO so many IDIOTS get into prominent positions in american media etc etc etc…are all of them just psychotic powermongering egotistical grabbers? ONE thing is sure, they certainly lack understanding…they work to make life worse…
Good piece. Couple of thoughts / observations:
'Nudge Units' (etc) - I wonder what we actually vote for during elections, if not for the implicit acceptance of such psychological influencing? If political parties were prevented from promulgating their world / political views once elected, one could argue that we could do away with representative democracy in the way it is currently conceptualised (at least at a National level) - that is, voting for a person / group that hold similar 'political' viewpoints, beliefs etc - and replacing it all with 5-year job slots for competent individuals to apply for and occupy before having to 're-apply' through a ballot box (come to think of it, it seems that is what is happening now anyway...). I am not advocating for the use of the psychological influence units, merely thinking through what it means to participate in a system where we assume that the 'winners' will not indulge in efforts to make people more likely to do as they are told and like it, and will not seek to influence future voting decisions in their favour (using the very state machinery we pay for!).
'Euthanasia' and 'Bodily Autonomy' - It is abhorrent that the state can prevent its 'citizens' from voluntarily, with no risk to others, and at their own expense, seeking potentially life saving treatments and life ending procedures. I have been horrified at instances over the last few years where the UK state has sought to prevent parents from accessing potentially life saving treatments for their children (inside and outside of the UK). And whilst this is the polar opposite of the central theme of the article, it does point to the UK State attitude to individual freedom and bodily autonomy - you have none. And if that is true, how CAN we trust that this legislation will not, over time, become a convenient way of dealing with inconvenient problems?
never forget that the Nazis started off with Euthanasia of the mentally feeble.